Backstory: Lester Saunders Hill wrote unpublished notes, about 40 pages long, probably in the mid- to late 1920s. They were titled “The checking of the accuracy of transmittal of telegraphic communications by means of operations in finite algebraic fields”. In the 1960s this manuscript was given to David Kahn by Hill’s widow. The notes were typewritten, but mathematical symbols, tables, insertions, and some footnotes were often handwritten. The manuscript is being LaTeXed “as we speak”. I thank Chris Christensen, the National Cryptologic Museum, and NSA’s David Kahn Collection, for their help in obtaining these notes. Many thanks also to Rene Stein of the NSA Cryptologic Museum library and David Kahn for permission to publish this transcription. Comments by transcriber will look his this: [This is a comment. – wdj]. I used Sage (www.sagemath.org) to generate the tables in LaTeX.

Here is just the second section of his paper. I hope to post more later. (Part 1 is here.)

**Secton 2: Lemmas concerning algebraic fields**

Familiarity with primary notions in the theory of finite algebraic fields, and of their algebraic extensions, will naturally be assumed here. Reference is made, however, to Steinitz [St], Dickson [D], Scorza [Sc]. But several points which will be needed very frequently in the following pages are summarized here in a series of lemmas. These lemmas assert properties of any algebraic field, whether it be finite or not.

**Lemma 1:**

Let denote an algebraic field. Let the coeefficients in the system of equations

be elements of . Let denote the value, in , of the determinant

The system of equations has a solution other than

if and only if .

**Lemma 2:**

Let denote an algebraic field. Let the coeefficients in the system of equations

be elements of , and let be less than . Then the system of equations certainly has a solution other than

**Lemma 3:**

Let denote an algebraic field. Let the and the denote elements of and let at least one of the be different from zero. Consider the determinant

If (Footnote: The case does not concern us.) then the system of equations

has one and only one solution.

Evidently, when solutions exist for the systems of equations considered in the forgoing three lemmas, such solutions lie entirely in the field .

The lemma which follows is particularly useful. It is an immediate corollary of Lemma 1.

**Lemma 4:**

Let denote an algebraic field. Let the denote elements of . Then if

we can determine at least one sequence of elements , , , , which are not necessarily distinct but certainly are not all equal to zero, such that

**Lemma 5:**

The algebraic equation of $th degree

with coefficients in the algebraic field , can not have more than roots in .

Most of the considerations of the present paper will depend, more or less directly, upon these five lemmas.

**References:**

[D] L. E. Dickson, **Linear groups with an exposition of the Galois field theory**, B. G. Teubner, Leipzig, 1901. Available here:

http://archive.org/details/lineargroupswith00dickuoft

[Sc] G. Scorza, **Corpi numerici e algebre**, Giuseppe Principato, 1921.

[St] E. Steinitz, *Algebraische theorie der korper*, Journal fur die reine und angew. Mathamtik 137(1910)167-308.

Pingback: Lester Hill’s “The checking of the accuracy …”, part 3 « Yet Another Mathblog